[ 2006 Blog | Long Lost Twins ]
Merry
Christmas - I feel it, why can't I say it?
December 19, 2007
Mike Huckabee is a religious man. He makes no bones about it. A very nice guy, totally sincere, and a devout Christian, probably in the real sense of the word, unlike Evangelical Christian Fundamentalists who are so anti-Christian it's embarrassing. Mike Huckabee should never be President of the US because his religious convictions, while being sincere, will rule the country, and that's never a good thing for a country as diverse as the US. (The Fundamentalists I refer to go around hating people and trying to ensure the only people with rights are those exactly like they are, preaching messages that are diametrically opposed to the teachings of Christ himself who taught tolerance, forgiveness and inclusion - these nut-jobs teach intolerance, vengeance and exclusion exclusively.)
(Ahem... mini-rant over)
But I can't believe I'm in agreement with Mike Huckabee on an issue.
This morning he was on The Today Show defending his "floating cross" in his new ad (a shelf behind him that looks like a cross - duh, it's a shelf - he's not actually defending it, becaus it was unintentional - he's just explaining that people see what they want to see, and that the crew of the video was quite amused to see the response to what was just a nice set dressing), and he's upset a bit about people not being able to say "Merry Christmas" anymore.
I've been upset about political-correctness for a long time now. And suddenly this tendency towards political-correctness reached its limit in my brain and something went "click". It's been building for several years now.
It's the one thing that's been bugging me all this month. I'm sick to the teeth of hearing "Happy Holidays", or people talking about what they're going to do over "the holidays".
Sure, there are a few other holidays in this month, and a lot of us are taking some "holidays" from work, but let's face it, most of us are not celebrating "the holidays", we're celebrating "Christmas". Yes, even atheists like me are actually celebrating "Christmas". We're not celebrating "New Years", not yet anyway. That's a week later. When we do celebrate "New Years", we'll be saying "Happy New Year!" not "Happy Holiday!" or "Happy Yet Another Winter Holiday"
Some of us are celebrating "Hanukkah". They're not celebrating "8 Holidays". They should be able to say "Happy Hannukah", yes, even to people who aren't Jewish. And I have a lot of friends and extended famliy who are Jewish, and during Hanukkah we serve Jewish standards (I look forward to the yummy latkes) for dinner so Charlotte can help celebrate that particular holiday since so many of her friends are doing the same.
Some of us say "Happy Winter Solstice." They're not celebrating "the Holidays", they're celebrating the shortest day of the year, which has been steeped in pagan and other traditions on earth since the recognition of the passing of time began. They should be able to say "Happy Solstice".
I'm not offended when someone says to me, "Happy Hanukkah" or "Happy Diwali" (I have a lot of Indian friends and neighbors) or "Happy Ramadan" or "Happy Solstice". I usually respond in kind. They're telling me what they are celebrating, and I'm telling to have a happy celebration, whatever it may be.
What does offend me is this politically-correct total public conversion to "Happy Holidays".
It didn't start grinding on me until I saw that Rachel Ray (the Joker of cooking hosts - have you seen that smile? Her ears may fall in at the corners) Dunkin Donuts ad where she repeats several times in one paragraph about "the Holidays". Not "Christmas", which she is most likely really has fond memories of (when it was called "Christmas", not "Holiday") since she comes from a Sicilian background. But it sounds so hollow generifying it like this.
Yeah, I know "Holiday" simply means "Holy Day" but that's not what it sounds like when I hear it these days. I hear "Happy Government-And-Corporate-Approved Word For Whatever Happy Day You May Deem Worth Celebrating".
Whew... Rant over.
Merry
Christmas
everyone.
srsly
Class-Action
Lawsuit - How Did I End Up Having To Make A Choice Between Two Abhorrent Courses
of Action?
December 12, 2007
Today in the mail I got notice of a class-action lawsuit settlement that involves me.
VISA, MasterCard and Diner's Card, for hiding a 1-3% surcharge on international card charges, had a class action lawsuit filed, and the settlement entitles me to $25.00 without hassle, or 1% of all of my foreign-based card charges from 1996 to 2006.
During that time I spent a lot of vacation time and money in Canada.
But it rankles me. I absolutely hate hate hate class-action lawsuits where the gathered plaintiffs receive $25.00 each, while the four lawyers who invented the suit and won it get millions each.
But if I don't send it in, that portion of the money goes to the god-damned lawyers.
What to do, what to do... Unbenownst to me, I'm placed in a Catch-22 situation where I'm damned if I do and I'm damned if I don't.
Either one I'm doing something I find disdainful - claiming the money, or leaving it in the coffers of the blood-sucking lawyers.
One way I get money, the other I don't.
Perhaps I should claim it and use it to pay a portion of my VISA bill. That at least would be the least-abhorrent course of action here.
(Please don't take my anti-blood-sucking-lawyer rant here to mean ALL lawyers - it is aimed solely at blood-sucking class-action-muck-scrounging lawyers who get millions while their clients get pittance in invented lawsuits in which no one got harmed much or at all, while lawyers rake in the bucks.)
Pumpkin Carving
October 28, 2007
Tomorrow my company will be holding a company pumpkin carving contest, among other things. It's a busy day of company meetings and Halloween partying.
This year, for the company contest, I used my previous experience from last year, carving a pumpkin, only this time I did a slightly better job. It's still not perfect, but I like it. I went wth a similar stitched-up face from last year, but this year I went with tearing the flesh off the face below the nose and exposing the skull underneath. I think it's better.
After finishing it and photographing it, I stared at a photo long enough to notice it needed a bit more detail. I had torn the lip on the left (our left) side of the nose, and when I saw the photo, it seemed tacked-on. So I had enough pulp left there to carve in another couple of stitches which were more in keeping with the theme, and makes it a bit creepier.
(Note: I did win the contest! - $25.00 Best Buy Gift Card! Woot!)
Last year I tried this new technique of pumpkin-carving, inspired by this site, that I thought was good, if you're good at actual sculpture, but even an amateur could get some results. Here's my result:
Overall I was not very happy with it. Using unfamiliar tools and techniques I did generate an interesting pumpkin, but I found the realism less than I had hoped for. But hey, what the heck.
Casablanca
Pass
October 14, 2007
My daughter loves books, and she loves antiques. So imagine her delight when at a recent Church yard sale she found a bag of old books. She snapped it up. In it was a bit of a delight. There was a small military Bible with photos in it. Also in it was a rank insignia for two years' oversea service, and the following:
Note that it's dated January 2, 1943. The film "Casablanca", a major film classic, came out this year. In fact, according to IMDB, it was released January 23, 1943.
The soldier was in the US Army, and was named Herbert Tonner. Another interesting thing about that is if you Google that name, you only end up with German hits. So it's a very German name, though he was obviously an American in the US Army.
There was another pass too, but this one is a major find, being so relatable to one of America's greatest films ever made.
R.I.P. Charlie,
aged 18 - Summer 1989 - September 22, 2007
October 7, 2007
We got Charlie at the Village Mall in St. John's in the late summer of 1989. Carol went to pick us up a cat and found this adorable beige tabby frolicking like crazy while his siblings slept. She fell in love with him immediately. She had no cash so she asked the store clerk if they'd hold him while she went to get some money from the ATM. When she got back the clerk told her several other people wanted to buy him while she was gone. We were so lucky! Charlie bonded with me almost instantly. He was wonderful.
In October, 1989, when he was still a young kitten we put a fire log in our bedroom fireplace and when it eventually burned out, Charlie was intrigued by the burning embers, the way they danced, and he jumped into the fireplace. A red-hot ember got caught between his back toe pads and he let out a yell and ran right out to me. This was Halloween night, as we were all dressing up to go out for a party. Charlie ran down the hall and found me. The burning ember was still red hot in his foot and I swept him up and immediately put his paw under cold running water. We took him to a vet the next morning and she said he might lose some pads and that surgery was likely. But first, we were to clean his wound three times daily with saline solution squirted directly into his burned pads. We held him in the sink and soaked his paw, and then we'd hold him tightly and squirt the salt solution into his raw flesh. He yowled, and then we'd have to give him antibiotic in another syringe directly into his mouth. He was listless, didn't move much. We kept a towel on a low chair so he could just sit there most of the day. His fur got unkempt, as he wasn't taking care of it. Then one day, a couple of weeks later, I came home from work and he was all clean, glittering and fluffy, and bounded down the hall on all four paws. His paw had completely healed. Since that day he's been healthy and very happy.
He also learned to fetch coke bottle tops. I'd thrown them down our long Victorian hallway, and he'd run and get it, running back with the cap in his mouth - so cute! and he'd drop it... just shy of my reach while I sat on the couch, so I'd have to move to pick it up and toss it again. A game he never tired of.
When Carol went to Corner Brook to get her Education Degree and then to La Scie to teach for a year I moved to a one-bedroom apartment where Charlie and I spent a long time really bonding. He also gained a lot of weight. While Carol was in La Scie she took in Spike, our other lovely cat who died at the age of 14 about 3 years ago, nearly to the day Charlie died. When Carol finished her stint in La Scie and we were re-united, Charlie and Spike were thrust together and they never liked each other.
We had to have Charlie and Spike declawed before Charlotte was born, for fear they would scratch Charlotte. We wouldn't have been so paranoid except someone I worked with had her baby mauled by their cat, and his face was scarred. They didn't like it. We didn't like it. But it was necessary and neither would ever be an outdoor cat.
Charlie and Spike greeted Charlotte with some skepticism, but while Spike eventually came around and more or less became her cat, Charlie never totally warmed up to Charlotte. Kids make so many sudden noises and moves. Cats aren't comfortable with that. But they did love each other in a way.
Charlie went deaf about 4 years ago, not long after Spike did. Spike died 3 years ago from Renal Failure. He stopped eating, and he showed all the signs of renal failiure, which is common in elderly cats. This year Charlie started to show the same symptoms, but while Spike's symptoms lingered - he was losing weight, and we tried new diets and other methods of making him eat - Charlie declined over a period of 3 days. On Saturday, September 22, we took him to the Vet, and when we got home later that day we had a phone call from the Vet's office saying he had severe renal failure and should go to Emergency at the Tufts' Pet Hospital a few miles south of here. Well there was no way we could afford that, and renal failure is not curable. After consulting with Tufts, we all more or less agreed Charlie should die at home, with us making his as comfortable as we could.
That day he was stumbling worse and worse on his back legs. He couldn't get around very well. At one point he slept on a cushion, and fell off it and couldn't right himself at all. I had to pick him up. That night we figured he might go in his sleep, but the next morning, Sunday, he was still alive. But he couldn't make it to the litter box. I helped him in where he stood for a while, then laid down in the litter. I picked him up and put him on his favorite blanket and looked at his mouth. It was awful, it had blood in it. He was dying, clearly.
So we decided it was time to take him to Tufts to have him put to sleep. Charlotte was great about it. We thought she'd be more upset, but even she, at 11, said the best thing would be to have him put to sleep. The rest of his life would be agony. So I held him in my arms as Carol drove. We took him in, they took him in the back and put an IV in his arm, and then brought him back out to us where I held him with his head in my hand, and everyone petting him. He looked comfortable and happy to be with us. Then the doctor came in and ended it. He went very quickly and peacefully and I could feel his head become a weight in my hand.
After about 10 seconds I could feel his throat gulp, then he let out a gasp of air. But he was dead already by then.
It was a sad day, but the day itself was beautiful, and we took a long walk through Stonybrook after giving Charlie over to be cremated.
After Spike died I had kind of been saying good-bye to Charlie for a long time. I never expected him to live to see 18, but he did, and I'm grateful he did. I did some of my grieving in the two or three years before he died, so it wasn't as hard on me as I thought it would be, but I was still broken-hearted. My buddy was gone. And he was my buddy. We were inseparable. We were incredibly close, and I'll always miss him.
Just the other day we got his ashes back and I've been searching our photos for a good picture of him to put with his ashes. I was thinking of one of these:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Charlie, we'll miss you.
So what's happened since May 13, the last time I wrote on this page? Plenty. Rowan's growing up and is just as cute and cuddly as ever. We went on vacation to Newfoundland and had a spectacular time in Gros Morne and with my cousin Mike and his family in Port Aux Choix. Man, we spent a bunch of time finding fossils on the beach at a 10:00pm or later beach marshmallow roast and fire. Work's going ok, I got to rig Gollum, and while I made a few boo-boos, it was the most complex rig I've ever done, and I learned a HEAP! Lots happened since May, let me tell you. So I'll just try to write a few specific entries to catch up.
New Room-mate -
Rowan
May 13, 2007
Yesterday we gained a new room-mate. Name of Rowan, an 8-week-old six-toed male tabby kitten. We were somewhat concerned that Charlie, the 18-year-old ginger tabby, generally intollerant of other guests, especially animals, would get very upset, but that Willow, our two-year-old female tortoise-shell, would be more welcoming, due to her constant interest in ingaging Charlie.
But if anything the opposite was true. Willow started growling and hissing right away, and even attacked us, not in a nice way, but with claws fully out and viciousness on her mind. Charlie, on the other hand, showed some mild interest, but absolutely no hostility at all, completely the opposite of how he reacted to Willow when she first entered the household.
Anyway, Rowan is very sweet, very cuddly, and after just a few hours of getting used to the place (and her new much larger counterparts) he was already acting quite comfortable, playing and roaming, not giving much mind to the other cats. In case of threat he retreats to the legs of the table where he feels more secure, but in general he doesn't feel the need to anymore.
Enough chat. Here's the pics:
An Atheist's Nightmare, Apparently
April 24, 2007
First, watch this video: "Peanut Butter - An Atheist's Nightmare"
Then watch this video, "The Atheist's Nightmare: The Banana:" (And yeah, that's the Kirk Cameron)
So if either of these could give an atheist a nightmare, imagine the horror of:
The Grand Unification Theory of Nightmaring Those Atheists!!!
The Peanut Butter And Banana Sandwich!
Comcast Cable - Ridiculous "Customer
Service" - Someone else's theft is now my problem???
April 24, 2007
So we're moving to a new apartment. We jump online to avail of Comcast Cable's online transfer service.
All was going smoothly for about 8 seconds until we were told that the person who previously rented the apartment we are moving into did not return their Cable equipment.
So guess what that means? They can't process my order.
Now I have to go to their office, wait in line with my new lease to prove I'm not the guy who was the previous resident of that apartment.
Uh... you know I'm not. You have my current address, and all of my information. You have my payment records at my current address for 11 years. That's worth repeating. 11 years!
The chat log follows (with some information removed for privacy) Areas in bold for emphasis. Actual names replaced with "Tech One" and "Tech Two"
We are experiencing higher than usual service times. Please wait and an analyst will be with you shortly.
Tech One>Hi! Thank you for choosing Comcast. My name is Tech One and I'll be assisting you tonight. It should only take me a minute to bring up the needed information. In the meantime, feel free to ask questions.
Tech One>At Comcast we value our customer's security and privacy. For account verification may I have the last four digits of the Social Security Number associated with the account or the full account number, please?
comcast_guest>****Type your message here
Tech One>I apologize, but unfortunately that does not match the SSN on the account. May I have the full 16 digit account number or the exact amount of the last bill paid, please?
comcast_guest>****************
Tech One>Perfect. Thank you, Sean.
Tech One>I can most definitely assist you with transferring your service. One moment please while I check the serviceability of your new address.
comcast_guest>Thank you
Tech One>I apologize, but there is unretunred equipment from the previous customer at the specific service address that you are requesting service at. Unfortunately I am not able to complete your order. If you are the current resident at that address, you will need to go to your local Comcast center with your Lease Agreement or Title of Ownership to confirm that you are not the previous customer and so that your services can be set up.
Tech One>I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause for you.
Tech One>ny
Tech One>Is there anything else that I can help you with today?
comcast_guest>Could you explain that please?
comcast_guest)>Hellow?
Tech One>The previous customer at the service address you are wishing to be transferred to did not return their equipment. Because I cannot confirm that you are not the previous customer, I am unable to continue with the transfer.
comcast_guest>You can indeed confirm that I am not the previous customer at that address, because I am the CURRENT resident of *************, and you have my account on your screen.
comcast_guest>I am moving INTO that address on ******.
comcast_guest>What the previous tenant did is not my problem.
comcast_guest>You have the information, I presume, of the previous tennant at that address. You also have MY current information.
Tech One>Unfortunately, this is the Comcast policy and I am unable to continue with the transfer. This policy is for your protection as well as Comcast. Comcast wants to ensure that customers who leave delinquent balances on accounts are not signing up for services under a different name. This is to help lower the cost of bad debt accounts and to alleviate any costs being passed on to the customer.
comcast_guest>Excuse me. You have my current address, my current account information, and everything you need to confirm MY identity, and that that identity is NOT the same as the previous tennant at that address.
comcast_guest>That current address is empty.
comcast_guest>It is being moved into by me on the **th.
comcast_guest>You also know that my current account has been active for almost a decade.
comcast_guest>Through your current company, and the previous owners, Cablevision, and any other company that has owned this service since I got it in 1996.
Tech One>I understand this, Sean. But I'm afraid according to Comcast policies I am unable to continue with the transfer.
comcast_guest>Then put me on with your manager please.
Tech One>You will need to go to your local Comcast center with your Lease Agreement or Title of Ownership to confirm that you are not the previous customer and so that your services can be set up.
comcast_guest>Please put me on with your manager. Your shift supervisor.
Tech One>I can certainly transfer you to a manager, Sean. But I must let you know that they will be telling you the exact same thing.
Tech One>One moment please.
comcast_guest>Then please do so. Don't let my ten years of loyalty interfere with your "policies".
Tech One>Thank you for your patience, Sean. I apologize for the wait. I will be a minute or two more while I located a supervisor for you.
Tech One>Please wait, while the problem is escalated to another analyst
Tech Two>Thank you for waiting. I apologize for any inconvenience. My name is Richard, and I am the supervisor on duty tonight. One moment, please, while I bring up your account and go over the transcript of the chat session to this point.
Tech Two>Thank you for waiting. I understand that you would like to transfer your service, though Tech One advised you that we could not complete your request due to the previous tenant. is that correct?
comcast_guest>The previous tenant is not me, however. I have been a loyal customer in the same apartment complex for nearly 11 years, and all of your information confirms that I am NOT the person who didn't return your equipmen.t
comcast_guest>I am moving INTO that apartment. It is currently vacated.
comcast_guest>We move in on the **th. You have my customer record for 11 years, and have no reason not to complete my request for moving the service regardless of what someone else did at that address.
Tech Two>Thank you. First, let me say that I have recently checked about this policy in this local center, and have been advised that we cannot process the order in this case. I wanted to verify this, as I don't agree with it at all.
Tech Two>Because I have been advised that this is the case (rightly or wrongly), I am compelled to follow the policy, unfortunately.
comcast_guest>So what difference does it make to me other than I have to leave my work and sit in your office's waiting line for two hours in order to do what you can easily do for me right now as you have my record for 11 years on file, and can completely confirm my identity?
Tech Two>I can't tell you the difference. However, I may have a solution for you.
comcast_guest>Please tell me.
Tech Two>I believe this case may be a breakdown in communication between departments (voice and chat support).
Tech Two>I suggest that you call our transfer number, and I am sure they will be able to process this request.
comcast_guest>And the number is?
Tech Two>(I am currently escalating this particular questionable policy to the operations manager in my center, but he hasn't been in yet)
Tech Two>The number is 1-877-739-0934 [I called it the moment he gave it to me. Closed. Call back during business hours please.]
comcast_guest)>They are closed.
Tech Two>I sincerely apologize for this situation, and completely agree that we should accommodate you. However, due to circumstances, my particular hands are tied in this case.
Tech Two>I can only suggest that you call that number tomorrow.
comcast_guest>Ugh... look, this online service of yours is supposed to be a conveinence. Now I have to spend an hour or more on the phone tomorrow during my own work time only to be told the same thing, and then I'll have to at some point AFTER we move in (in order to get the lease I need) then leave work again and spend two hours in a lineup at your office in order to do what you can clearly do right now.
comcast_guest>Leaving me without Cable when I move in, and several lost hours. Hours, not minutes. Of work when this could be settled online now.
comcast_guest>What is it that you need to confirm my identity, and that I have been at the same address for 11 years, and that the deadbeat who is now inconveniencing me is NOT me?
Tech Two>Basically, what would need to be confirmed is that you are the owner/lessee of the address that you are moving into.
Tech Two>This would prove you are not the person who is currently there. [There is no one currently there by the way, if that wasn't already obvious]
Tech Two>Logically, that makes no sense to me.
comcast_guest>You know I am not the person who is currently there because you have all of my information, including my address, and 11 years of paid bills, to prove it.
comcast_guest>You could send a truck around right now and you'll see that ********** (the address we're moving INTO) is currently emtpy and dark.
Tech Two>Believe me, I have tried to point that out to my manager.
comcast_guest>Because there is no one there. We move into it on Saturday.
comcast_guest>Then your manager needs to speak to me. ***-***-****. Right away please.
comcast_guest>Since the number you gave me is closed, please ask him to call me.
Tech Two>I'm sorry, but I cannot have my manager (who has gone home for the day), call you.
comcast_guest>Sigh... this is ridiculous. (Grabs chat log and heads to my blog...)
Tech Two>Once again, I agree with you 100%, however, I will not risk my job on the fact that someone has made up a bad policy.
comcast_guest>I understand the position you're in, but you have been of no help to me, and I'm sure a large internet community wouldn't mind hearing my story.
comcast_guest>http://www.huxter.org/blog/ - Please feel free to read it at your leisure in about 15 minutes.
Tech Two> I am sure they would find it interesting. As I said, I dealt with this issue the other day, and checked up on it, because I found it ludicrous.
comcast_guest > But I appreciate your attempt to help.
Tech Two> Can I assist you with anything else, tonight?
comcast_guest > Obviously not.
Tech Two> Thank you for contacting Comcast. Have a good night.
Tech Two> Analyst has closed chat and left the room
So get this line: Basically, what would need to be confirmed is that you are the owner/lessee of the address that you are moving into. This would prove you are not the person who is currently there. Logically, that makes no sense to me.
So basically, I have to go to the office and bring a lease for the apartment to prove I'm not the current person at that apartment? That doesn't make much sense, as Richard pointed out.
Thanks, Comcast... you've been great.
Friday was an amazing day for me. It was riddled with mixed emotions.
The big event was we shipped Lord of the Rings, Shadows of Angmar. Or just as well... people who pre-ordered the game got to begin playing the Open Beta more accurately called World Tour on Friday. So it was a day of huge anticipation at Turbine.
We sort of consider it "ship" because the servers won't be reset or wiped between now and the day of the actual public ship. March 30, people who pre-ordered are allowed to play, create their characters, and level them up to level 15. Those characters will carry over to Ship.
On April 6, everyone in the world who has a key can begin playing, level their characters up to level 15. Those characters will carry over to Ship.
On April 24, we ship, but it will in reality just be the third step in a tiered launch program.
Mingle that excitement in with the departure of a few very good co-workers. This is part of the biz. People finish a huge project, and some people move on. It just hurts when those who leave are some of the most competent and enjoyable co-workers around.
Plus I got my evaluation, which was incredibly positive, and Beta buzz is amazing. I've never experienced Beta buzz this positive. Ever. And I've shipped Asheron's Call, Dungeons & Dragons Online: Stormreach and LOTRO now. (I was not directly involved with Asheron's Call 2, but I was there when it shipped.)
I'm an old hand at the MMO game now, and even watching other companies' Betas, I have never seen this consistent, constant level of postiive buzz.
LOTRO, yesterday and today, is #1 seller at Amazon.com's Video Games category, even above Guitar Hero 2 Bundle (which was #2 today) and a Sims expansion (which was #2 yesterday.)
Yesterday, (though it fluctuates wildly) LOTRO was #1 on Gamespot, and today it's #2.
The Beta launch went very smoothly, with some hitches and problems, but watching the buzzing activity in the War Room yesterday as rollout proceeded was not only enlightening, but awe-inspiring and encouraging.
All through this, I was somehow able to get some work done.
And as the day ended and I decided to leave early (well, I usually start my day around 7:30am) I instead handed a few beers around the art department and we sat around reminiscing about other Betas, and specifically, the Asheron's Call End of Beta, which I have termed "The End-of-Beta to End All End-of-Betas".
I fondly recalled the Taper Dancing, as Joe Angell, Chris Dyl, Jason Booth and I yelled out taper combinations so that we could, in exact unison, do interesting dances in front of the fireplace at the Shoushi Discoteque, which Jason mostly put into the game for End of Beta. Banderlings and a Tusker danced to our sides, and back, while we fizzled out our Taper combinations. Meanwhile a volcano had burned down Glendenwood, I believe it was, and an ominous comet dominated the sky.
It was amazing. And for a company which had very few members who had ever shipped a game before (we were a startup with very little - ie: no - game-development experience) this was an amazing day.
Yesterday, the start of LOTRO's "World Tour", was a day that held similar feelings. You had to scour forums to find anything negative, and often when you did find a negative post, it was followed by naysayers who clarified the poster's misconceptions, or otherwise shouted them down.
It was weird. Surreal.
It's very hard to recall a day with such mixed emotions, yet so thoroughly satisfying.
And today Doctor Who's Season 3 starts up. I'm giddy. I can barely stand.
"Standoff"
at the White House?
March 22, 2007
Ok, how can you make yourself look guilty?
White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, who once wrote on the Clinton investigation: "Most of us want no part of a president who is cynical enough to use the majesty of his office to evade the one thing he is sworn to uphold -- the rule of law" said yesterday "Do you want to get to the truth or create a political spectacle, those are your two options." Quite a change in attitude, Mr. Snow.
Did they retroactively create the term "Snow Job" after you using some kind of time machine and a jar of mayonnaise?
When the Judiciary committee investigating the political motivations behind the firing of 8 federal attorneys asked to talk to Karl Rove and Harriet Myer, George W. Bush, that bastion of truth and justice, condescended to make the committe an "offer" instead.
Here's a fun game: You try that. Next time a court issues a summons for you to testify in a trial, say no. See what happens.
Bush's "offer" (oh, thank you so much, Mr. President for throwing us this bone of decent behavior) is that the officials can talk to the committee, but not under oath, and with no transcript. And this, from the likes of Karl Rove is supposed to assure he won't lie to Congress? This administration has done nothing but lie from November 2000 to now, and the pattern is so ingrained, I'd doubt Karl Rove if he said the world was round.
So if they're going to tell the truth, why not put them under oath? And without a transcript, as any attorney would tell you, anything they say is useless. Their testimony won't be worth the paper it isn't written on.
But Bush says no. If subpoenas are issued, no one will talk. Ever.
Yeah, that makes you look nice and innocent, Mr. Bush. Nothin' to hide here...
I'm glad our only options are giving these officials an atmosphere in which they can lie with impugnity, or not have them talk at all. So what's the point?
Convict them in absentia would be my method there. If you're not willing to step up and clear up the facts, we'll just have to see them as they present themselves, and at this point, you're guilty.
Bush wants this to look like a Democratic witch hunt, when in fact it's a Democratic investigation into illegal firings based on political motivations, and Bush does not want the truth to come out.
After what we call a "document dump" (where so much documentation is released that it takes too much effort to sift through it for anything useful) of 3000 pages of e-mail (in a vain effort to pretend the White House is cooperating) we find a lot of interesting details, but what we also find is that there is a 3-week gap in the e-mails. Apparently during those three weeks directly leading up to the actual firings, only one e-mail got sent around the Justice Department, and it was a request for some unrelated form. Yeah... pull the other one.
This is another Bush coverup on the scale of many of his other coverups, including the one that got Scooter Libby convicted of lying to congress. (But of course if Libby was allowed to testify not under oath and without a transcript, he'd be walking free right now because he lied to Congress when he testified about the outing of Valerie Plame, an undercover CIA agent.)
What really gets me about this whole affair is that to take down members of this criminal administration, it took the firing of 8 federal attorneys, but torture (Gonzales wrote a paper for Bush justifying torture), lying to congress about WMDs (Bush had respected General Colin Powell deliver the lies in a nice slide show), leading the most powerful nation in the world to war over a personal family vendetta and personal glory (Bush wanted to be a War President, and he would have done anything to achieve that status), suspending the right of Habeus Corpus (Gonzales again, who said "The Constitution does not guarantee the right of Habeus Corpus - what it says is that the right of Habeus Corpus can't be suspended. - Oh, that's different, then.), the treasonous exposure of an undercover CIA agent (Rove, Libby, Cheney, Bush), wiretapping US citizens (Bush again), signing statements (Bush is above the law, remember?) - that this is what might bring down some of these criminals?
That's what's astounding.
But hey, they got Capone not on charges of his copious criminal activities, but on tax evasion. At least he was got.
The Buck Starts Here
February 18, 2007
For the third time in recent years the US has minted a new dollar
coin.
The previous two, the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin and the Sacagawea dollar coin, were nice coins, but they didn't "take", apparently. That means the US public didn't embrace the change, so to speak.
Here's the problem. The US Mint spends too much money making dollar bills. Dollar bills are more expensive to produce, get damaged easier, and have to be destroyed after a few years, generally. The cost is too much.
Coins cost less to make and last longer.
So the Mint creates these in the hopes that the US population will use them rather than the more expensive buck.
Well it's never going to happen. Hoping the US public will change its ways is just plain stupid, because unless forced to, it just will not. Tradition and sentimentality, (not to mention just the whole gotten-used-to-it-iveness) is rampant in the US, and often trumps common sense.
For this campaign to work the US must stop making dollar bills.
In the 1980s when Canada introduced its dollar coin (immediately labelled "the loonie" because of the image of the loon on the back) it also stopped making $1.00 bills shortly afterwards, after a period of adjustment.
The downside? Vendors had to change vending machines to accept dollar coins. Did that kill anyone? Hardly. And while the initial expense was not small, the convenience of machines that didn't have those stupid bill readers was very good to the vending industry in general.
Canada embraced the new coin so much that it soon came out with a $2.00 coin, removing the $2.00 bill from circulation. The "twonie" was born, and a more beautiful coin you'll be hard-pressed to find.
The main argument I have heard from Americans as to why they don't want a dollar coing has to do with carrying heavy change in their pockets. They don't want to have to carry coins, basically. Well that doesn't make a lot of sense (no cents puns today) because they already carry around change, and useless change at that - the penny and the nickel (more on that shortly.)
This way, if you're carrying a bunch of change, you really have money in your pocket, and not just a bunch of almost worthless metal.
From experience (having lived in Canada for most of my life and being there when the transition to coins happened) I can tell you that having a pocket full of change suddenly means something, and is a far better feeling than haveing a pocketful of change that you could just toss onto the ground and still be as wealthy as you were moments earlier.
But no. Americans just don't want change. Literally. So much do they ardently fight change that they don't even want to color their paper money. Being one of the only countries in the world that has completely monochromatic money, they are far behind the times when it comes to money. Recently some attempts have been made to color the money here. And to add some of the security measures that have long been absent such as watermarks, which have been in the bills of most foreign countries for decades of longer.
The result was a $20.00 bill that looks like someone peed on
it.
And now the new $10.00 bill that looks like someone soaked it
in tea.
Not exactly a progressive change.
The US really needs to do several things to make life harder for counterfeiters and to embrace the new world economy. Because let's face it, the time is long gone when the US led the world's economy.
Stop printing $1.00 bills. This will force people to use the new coin, and the expense of minting dollar bills will be greatly diminished.
- Stop printing those collectors' items, the $2.00 bills. The only one I ever saw ended up on my shelf as a collectors' item, until I was desperate and had no money in my pocket to give my daughter for lunch one day and gave it to her to spend.
- Introduce a $2.00 coin.
- Stop making pennies. Pennies have long been worthless. When pennies were first created they meant something. They were worth at least a quarter, and perhaps more. The value of transactions don't need to be cut so fine. There's no need to mint a tenth-of-a-penny, or a hundredth-of-a-penny, but essentially that's what the penny has become. The penny has been shrinking and shrinking and the cost of minting them growing and growing until it is now worthless. No one carries pennies around to buy things anymore like they used to when they had real value. The time is long past to get rid of it once and for all.
People fear that eliminating the penny will mean people will mark up transactions to the next nickel. So what? There has been a constantly evolving finer cutting of transaction value to the point where that nickel doesn't mean anything. So let them round up or down. No one's the more wealthy or poor because of it.
- Stop making the nickel. Just get rid of the nickel and remove the hundredths place from all pricing. Who needs something to be $9.87? $9.90 is good enough. For that matter, just call it $9.9. If we simply remove the last digit from prices, get rid of the nickel and penny, purchasing will make much more sense. I mean no one pays $9.874 for anything do they? The further back past the decimal point we go the more pointless, costly and inefficient things are. (And don't mention that marketing gimick, the $2.10 9/10 for gas prices. That's just a gimick so they can make the price appear a penny lower on their signs. And again, that penny is worthless.)
- Color the paper money. I mean really color it, not just dip it in piss. The watermark's a good start. In Canada bills higher than the $10.00 also have a laser-etched square on it to make counterfeiting nearly impossible. Not to mention making it easier for the sight-impaired to distinguish between the bills they are using. Put Braille dots on the bills and use bright colors.
There is another excuse Americans use not to color their money - because it looks like Monopoly money. In fact they call all other countries' bills "Monopoly money". Yet they don't realze theirs looks like play money that you buy in dollar stores. It can be faked so easily the US is a laughing stock when it comes to counterfeiting. Monopoly money indeed!
- Convert to the Metric System, or System Internationale. Canada did it in the 70s, and while, again, there was a period of adjustment, it is now just natural there. Any measurement that uses such arbitrary and different measurements to measure one thing is antiquated and inefficient.
Quick, if you think you're so smart, convert 2.23 kilograms to pounds and ounces. Without using a calculator. Go. I'll give you 10 seconds. One person I gave that challenge to successfully converted the kilograms to pounds, but not ounces. He gave me the answer: 5.225 pounds. Talk about make my point! He used decimals which the metric system uses, but he did not convert the .225 pounds to ounces, which is how things are measured here. This old, antiquated, British system (ironically not even being used by the British anymore) is yet another example of a people so unwilling to embrace change that they are willing to isolate themselves economically from the rest of the world.
Sure, you're saying, no one refuses to deal with the US because it has to convert everything to Metric, but it does make things more expensive, and more inconvenient. And the conversion confusion can be expensive as well. For example one of the Mars Landers was lost due to a mistake in metric/empircal conversion in a software program causing NASA to lose contact with it. How much money was lost there due to a Metric conversion problem? Once the US slips much further down from its one-time position as leader of the world's economy, people will start balking at dealing with it if it does not convert to Metric.
With the metric system, things are just division by 10, the most natural thing our mathematical system does.
There you have it. My plan to bring the US into the 21st century with most of the rest of the world.
The Buck Starts Here!
I Won
A BAFTA!
February 3, 2007
Not exactly brand-new news, but pretty exciting, and I should probably celebrate it if not at my office on my web site.
Dungeons & Dragons Online: Stormreach, a game I spent about a year on in 2005/2006, won a BAFTA award in 2006.
What the heck is a BAFTA you may well ask. It's the British equivalent to the Academy Awards. The British Academy of Film and Television Awards added a Video Game category in 2006, and DDO won in the category of Multiplayer Game.
I'm particularly proud of this award as this is the same academy that has so recognized the greatness of the recent revival of Doctor Who, which has taken a boat-load of BAFTA awards for the show in the past two years, for its creator Russel T. Davies, Drama Series, Best Programme, among others.
Not to mention, a great guy I met at a Doctor Who convention back in May won a BAFTA just a few days before that convention. We got along great. Nice guy. He worked on most of the miniature effects for the first season, including the destruction of the Big Ben Tower in "Aliens of London". We got along so well partly because miniature work is one of the things I wish I had gotten a career in, and we were both hugely inspired by the work of Gerry Anderson and Derek Meddings. Now we share a BAFTA recognition, though mine is for a collaborative effort, and his is more individual.
Anyway, I figured I'd write about it, as almost no one has even brought it up in the media, and few people at my office appear to even know about it.
Don't you just hate it when you date everything from the previous year for the first few weeks of a new year? I've edited all my entries on this page from 2006 to 2007.
Amazing
Rube Goldberg Video, and Algorithm March
January 25, 2007
This video on YouTube is amazing if you like Rube Goldberg machines like I do.
This appears to be from the same Japanese TV show as this video: Algorithm March. Don't forget to watch it all the way through!
Brucie
Visits on his World Tour
January 20, 2007
A great podcast, Cool Shite on the Tube, sent its mascot, Little Bruce, on a world tour. I signed up, and Brucie spent a week with me and my family.
First
Blog Entry for 2007
January 19, 2007
No comment.